The Writ Petition No.2202 of 2009 was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear before the Court on the listing date despite being directed to appear under the caption 'for dismissal'.
Writ Petition dismissed for default/nonprosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA
WRIT PETITION No.2202 of 2009
Dated:21.10.2010
Between:
A.Chandra Sekhar Naidu.
….Petitioner
And
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by the Principal Secretary, (Municipal Administration and Urban Development) Secretariat, Hyderabad, And another.
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.2202 of 2009
ORDER:
When the matter was listed before this Court on 14.07.2010, none appeared for the petitioner. The matter was, therefore, directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Today the matter is appearing under the said caption. In spite of the same, none appears for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the petitioner is absent.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for default/nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ (N.V.RAMANA, J)
21.10.2010 vs
A.Chandra Sekhar Naidu
Government of Andhra Pradesh
N.V.RAMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
