Kondapalli Prasada Rao v. Post Master General
Case brief
What is this about?
In W.P. No. 21191 of 2005, the petitioners failed to appear when the matter was taken up for hearing. The writ petition was dismissed for default with no order as to costs.
In W.P. No. 21191 of 2005, the petitioners failed to appear when the matter was taken up for hearing. The writ petition was dismissed for default with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
W.P. No. 21191 OF 2005 02-09-2010
Between:
Kondapalli Prasada Rao and two others.
Petitioners
And
The Post Master General, Visakhapatnam and another.
Respondents
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T MEENA KUMARI AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
W.P. No. 21191 OF 2005
ORDER(per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T Meena Kumari) :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appears for the petitioners and there is no representation on their behalf.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
____________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J
02.09.2010
____________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J
kvr
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T MEENA KUMARI AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
W.P. No. 21191 OF 2005
(Order of the Division Bench made by the Hon’ble Smt Justice T Meena Kumari)
2nd September 2010
Kondapalli Prasada Rao and two others
The Post Master General, Visakhapatnam and another
T MEENA KUMARI
GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court