Ponnapureddy Rama Subba Reddy v. The Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged withdrawal of armed escort as illegal. During pendency, Government granted three gunmen based on a fresh representation. Court held no adjudication necessary and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 24th September 2009 is vacated. The writ petition is closed without adjudication.
What the court decided
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.20740 of 2009
Dated: 24-06-2010
Between:
Ponnapureddy Rama Subba Reddy.
… Petitioner
And
The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.20740 of 2009
ORDER:
In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in withdrawing the Gunmen and Armed Escort to the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently, to direct the respondents to provide Armed Escort with 2+2 Gunmen to him.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition claiming arbitrary withdrawal of armed escort to the petitioner requires adjudication given a fresh representation before the Government.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ponnapureddy Rama Subba Reddy
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District & others
Coram
R. SUBHASH REDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/20740/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court