Mubarakunnisa Begum v. The District Panchayat Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
petitioners failed to appear in writ petition, resulting in dismissal for non-prosecution. Associated miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.
petitioners failed to appear in writ petition, resulting in dismissal for non-prosecution. Associated miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FORUTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.20103 of 2010
Between:
Smt. Mubarakunnisa Begum & another.
..... Petitioners
AND
The District Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy District & others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : None
Counsel for respondents 1&2: AGP for Panchayat Raj Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri P. Raghavendra Reddy
(SC for Grampanchayat)
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.20103 of 2010
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the impugned order vide Roc.No.142/2010B1(Pts), dated 07.07.2010 issued by the 1st respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unjust and consequently set aside the same.”
On 07.09.2010, the matter was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners. On 06.10.2010, there was no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, the matter has been adjourned. Even today, when the matter has been called, there is no representation for the petitioners. It is therefore reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing their cause in the Writ Petition.
The Writ Petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.
As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition for non-prosecution,
WPMP.Nos.25498 and 35683 of 2010 are also dismissed.
____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
Date: 14.12.2010 ES
Smt. Mubarakunnisa Begum & another
The District Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy District
others
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court