Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence despite listing under 'For dismissal'. No substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
Date:13.04.2010.
W.P.NO.10047 OF 1999.
Between:
D.Muralidhar
..... PETITIONER
AND
Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others.
.....RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
As there was no representation for the petitioner on 12.04.2010, the matter is listed today under the caption “For dismissal”. Even today, none appeared for the petitioner.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
costs.
_________
G. ROHINI, J 13th April 2010 AMD
D.Muralidhar
Government of Andhra Pradesh
G. ROHINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
