This court treated the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous due to the submission that no cause survives for adjudication and dismissed the petition accordingly.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
C.R.P. No. 3440 OF 2006
Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of April, Two Thousand and Ten
Between
Smt. Ghousia Begum
Petitioner
AND
Syed Davar Salahuddin and others
Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
C.R.P. NO. 3440 OF 2006
ORAL ORDER:
When this Civil Revision Petition is taken up for hearing on admission, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no cause survives for adjudication and the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Justice T. Meena Kumari
April 13, 2010 MAS
Smt. Ghousia Begum
Syed Davar Salahuddin
others
T. Meena Kumari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
