The court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition as infructuous due to lack of necessity, with no substantive reasoning or parties provided in the text.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2514 of 2010
ORDER:
Sri Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the revision petition has become infructuous.
The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
Date:09.09.2010 usd
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
