Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal revision petition. The High Court granted permission, dismissing the revision as a result.
Permission to withdraw the revision petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE NINETTENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.928 OF 2009
Between:
P. Praveen Kumar
… PETITIONER
And
Smt. P. Padmaja @ Vijaya Lakshmi and another
… RESPONDENTS
This Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.928 OF 2009
ORDER:
Sri T.D. Phani Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the revision petition. Permission is granted.
Hence, the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J
July 19, 2010 MD
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.928 OF 2009
July 19, 2010
P. Praveen Kumar
Smt. P. Padmaja @ Vijaya Lakshmi and another
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
