High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of two petitions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail for petitioners/accused. The order issued direction but contains no substantive reasoning or outcome details regarding the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL,
TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
: PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE SRI. JUSTICE : P. SWAROOP REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NOS. 3210 AND 3264 of 2010
CRL. P NO.3210 OF 2010 :
Between:
1.D. Madhava Reddy, S/o Late D. Laxminarasimha Reddy,
2.D. Savithri, W/o D. Madhava Reddy,
3.D. Vinod Reddy, S/o D. Madhava Reddy.
.. Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4
And
The State of A.P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P.Hyderabad,
Rep. by Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, CCS, Hyderabad.
.. Respondent /
Complainant
Petition under Section 438 of Cr. P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail directing the Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, CCS, Hyderabad to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in the interest of justice.
CRl. P NO.3264 OF 2010 :
D. Anand Reddy, S/o Sri D. Madhava Reddy. .. Petitioner/Accused
And
The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. .. Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Section 438 of Cr. P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail, directing the Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, CCS, Hyderabad to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.179/2010 the interest of justice.
These petitions coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K. Rajagopal Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners in both Crl.P Nos.3210 & 3264 of 2010 and the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent in both Crl.P Nos.3210 & 3264 of 2010, the Court made the following;
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1.The XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2.The Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, CCS, Hyderabad.
2.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad (OUT)
3.One CC to Sri K. Rajagopal Reddy, Advocate. (OPUC)
4.One Spare Copy.
H.A.
DRAFTED BY : H.A. DATED : 09.04.10 APPROVED BY :
HIGH COURT
PSRJ
DATED : 07-04-2010
ORDER :
CRL. P NOS. 3210 AND 3264 of 2010
DIRECTION
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D. Madhava Reddy, S/o Late D. Laxminarasimha Reddy, D. Savithri, W/o D. Madhava Reddy, D. Vinod Reddy, S/o D. Madhava Reddy
D. Anand Reddy, S/o Sri D. Madhava Reddy
The State of A.P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P.Hyderabad, Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, CCS, Hyderabad
P. Swaroop Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
