In the absence of the appellants' counsel and representation, the court held that the appellants were not interested in pursuing the appeal and dismissed the civil miscellaneous second appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL No.13 of 2002
Date: 07.12.2010
Between: Sri Ashok Pandit and others. … Appellants And
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad and another.
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL No.13 of 2002
JUDGMENT :
The appellants’ counsel is absent inspite of listing the matter under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”. There is no representation. It appears that the appellants are not interested to pursue the appeal. 2. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed. No costs.
___________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 07.12.2010.
Msr
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL No.13 of 2002
07.12.2010 (Msr)
Sri Ashok Pandit and others
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad and another
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
