Single-judge order closing a contempt case after the respondent accepted that the petitioner's belongings were returned, deciding no further inquiry was necessary.
The contempt case is closed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 999 OF 2010
Dated: 29.09.2010
Between: Venishetti Prakash AND The Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad and others
..... PETITIONER
.....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 999 OF 2010
ORDER :
None appears for the petitioner.
Sri Ch.Satish Kumar, who accepted notice for the 4th respondent, on instructions stated that the personal belongings of the petitioner were returned on 14.08.2010 under panchanama.
Hence, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 29.09.2010 Ivd
Venishetti Prakash
The Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad
G. Rohini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
