Petitioner sought closure of a contempt case. The court accepted that the underlying order was complied with, deemed no further enquiry necessary, and settled the matter without costs.
No further enquiry necessary; contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWELTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1701 OF 2009
Between: A.Ravikumar AND
..... PETITIONER
M.John Wesley, I/c. Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Porumamilla Mandal, Kadapa District and another
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1701 of 2009
O R D E R :
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order in the writ petition has been complied with.
Hence, no further enquiry is necessary and the Contempt Case is accordingly closed. No costs.
_____________ Date: 12.03.2010 G. ROHINI, J.
Ivd
A. Ravikumar
M. John Wesley
G. Rohini
Justice G. Rohini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
