The appeal suit was dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant filed a letter stating the matter had been compromised out of court and he wished to withdraw the appeal. No representation was filed by the appellant.
The appeal suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR
APPEAL SUIT No. 74 of 2005
Date:03.11.2010
Between: Md.Iqbal
Appellant.
And Panja Verramma and others.
Respondents.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR
APPEAL SUIT No. 74 of 2005
JUDGMENT:
No representation for the appellant.
A letter is filed to the Registrar (Judicial) to post the matter on the ground that the matter has been compromised between the parties out of Court and that the appellant wants to withdraw the Appeal Suit.
Notice is also issued to the other side. In the circumstances, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
______________________ Justice B.Chandra Kumar
Date:03.11.2010 mrb
Md. Iqbal
Panja Verramma and others
B. Chandra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
