The appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the amounts were already received and a withdrawal memo was filed. The court did not adjudicate the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO
A.S.NO.4117 OF 2004
JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao}
Smt.A.Anasuya, learned counsel for the respondents, submitted that having regard to the fact the amounts have already been received and a memo to the effect of withdrawal has also been filed by the appellant, nothing survives in the appeal for further adjudication.
Recording the said submission, without going into the merits of the case, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
_________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J)
__________________ (V.SURI APPA RAO, J)
6th December 2010 RRB
Appellant
Respondents
B. PRAKASH RAO
V. SURI APPA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
