The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed an Appeal Suit wherein the parties settled out of court. A compromise petition was filed, recorded by the court, and the appellant withdrew the case per terms.
Appeal Suit dismissed in terms of compromise. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
APPEAL SUIT No.104 OF 2009
Between:
Erla Koteswaramma
..... APPELLANT
AND
Lakkamraju Sreenivasa Raju and another
....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
APPEAL SUIT No.104 OF 2009
JUDGMENT:
Both the parties are present. They are identified by their respective counsel. They stated that the matter has been settled out of the Court and compromise petition is filed to that effect. The terms of the compromise has been recorded. The appellant stated that she has no objection to withdraw the case.
2. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed in terms of the
compromise. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________ K.C. BHANU, J April 09, 2010 MD
Erla Koteswaramma
Lakkamraju Sreenivasa Raju and another
K.C. BHANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
