Writ petition seeking declaration that non-payment of exgratia was illegal and a direction to pay. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn following a letter from the counsel.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 28811 of 2008
Between:
Kummari Venkatachalam S/o. Changalraya Chetty R/o. Changambakkam Village, Satyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department (Land Acquisition), Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2 The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3 The Special Deputy Collector, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 4 The Tahsildar / Mandal Revenue Officer, Sathyavedu, Sathyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying exgratia to the petitioner over the land admeasuring Ac.2-00 cents in Sy.No.22/2B, of Changambakkam village, Satyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith pay the exgratia to the petitioner over the land admeasuring Ac.2-00 cents in Sy.No.22/2B, of Changambakkam village, Satyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.C.D.SEKHAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
The Court made the following :
ORAL ORDER:
The learned Counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dt. 17.7.2009 seeking to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the letter, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 20.7.2009. KRB.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION No. 28811 of 2008
Dated: 20.7.2009
Kummari Venkatachalam
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
GODA RAGHURAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
