Petitioner challenged a memo refusing land demarcation. Court held grievance no longer subsisted as survey was completed and report furnished, dismissing petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12008 of 2009
Between:
K.Laxman Rao S/o Laxmi Naraiah H.No.1-8-509 Chikkadpally,Hyderabad
..... PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order declaring the proceedings no G/362/2009 dt 25-5-2009 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal arbitrary without jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions of the Sy and Boundaries Act 1923 and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to survey and demarcate the land bearing Sy No.213 admeasuring Ac.2.30 guntas situated in Tondupalli (V) Ranga Reddy District by fixing boundaries in the interest of justice .
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.E.MADAN MOHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following :
ORDER :
The substantive grievance of the petitioner, namely, that the respondents have not surveyed the land in Sy.No.213 of Tondupalli Village, Ranga Reddy District and instead the second respondent has issued the impugned memo, dated 25-05-2009, that as the petitioner was not in physical position of the lands applied for demarcation and hence the demarcation could not be conducted, no longer subsists, as the survey and demarcation of the land in Sy.No.213 of Tondupally Village is now completed and a report has also been furnished to the petitioner.
In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
_________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J.
06th July, 2009. skmr
K.Laxman Rao
The District Collector Ranga Reddy District
The Tahsildar Shamshabad (M)
Goda Raghuram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
