Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was filed by the appellant indicating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
M.A. CIVIL MISCELLANEIOUS APPEAL No.3521 OF 2009
BETWEEN:
Gubbala Venkateswarlu S/o. Venkanna
…. Petitioner
AND
Addagalla Babulu S/o. Tatarao
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
M.A. CIVIL MISCELLANEIOUS APPEAL No.3521 OF 2009
JUDGMENT:
When the appeal came up for admission, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It indicates that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
_________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J November 05, 2009. KTL
Gubbala Venkateswarlu S/o. Venkanna
Addagalla Babulu S/o. Tatarao
B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
