Kancham Satyam v. Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 2165 of 2009
Between:
Kancham Satyam S/o Muthaiah
..... PETITIONER
AND
Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu S/o Lingaiah R/o GVR Towers Jammibanda Bazar Khammam, Khammam District
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge a t Khammam i n I.A. No. 549 o f 2009 i n O.S. NO. 114 o f 2009 Dt: 27/04/2009.
The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N.V. Anantha Krishna Advocate for the Petitioner, the Court made the following;
ORDER :
“Notice served.
Heard.
It is directed that there shall be a conditional interim attachment till 02.06.09, to which date the matter is posted before the Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Khammam and on 02.06.09 appropriate orders have to be passed by the above court.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Senior Civil Judge at Khammam .
2. Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu S/o Lingaiah, R/o GVR Towers Jammibanda Bazar, Khammam, Khammam District
3. One CC to Sri N.V. ANANTHA KRISHNA Advocate (OPUC)
4. One spare copy.
H.A.
DRAFTED BY : H.A. DATED : 21.05.09 APPROVED BY :
HIGH COURT
PSRJ
DATED: 20/05/2009
ORDER :
CRP. NO. 2165 of 2009
DIRECTION
Kancham Satyam S/o Muthaiah
Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu S/o Lingaiah
P. SWAROOP REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court