Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. The High Court made a short order directing issuance of copies to relevant parties and the petitioner's counsel, without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 8500 of 2009
Between:
C. Kanaka Ratnam S/o. Late C. Narayana
..... Petitioner/Accused No.2
(Accused in Cr.No. 215/2009 on the file of the II Town P.S., Vizianagaram)
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh,Through S.H.O. II Town P.S., Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.
.....Respondent
(Complainant in do)
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI B.G.RAVINDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Petition under Section 438 of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated therewith, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner herein on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Cr. No. 215 of 2009 of II Town P.S., Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER:
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vizianagaram
2. The Station House Officer, II Town P.S., Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram Districat
3. Two CCs Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
4. one CC to Sri B.G.Ravinder Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
5. One Spare copy
HIGH COURT
AB
DRAFTED ON 28-10-2009N
BCKJ
DATE: 28-10-2009
ORDER
CRL.P. NO. 8500 OF 2009
DIERCTION
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C. Kanaka Ratnam
State of Andhra Pradesh
B. CHANDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
