Bail order wherein the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, through a single judge, disposed of Criminal Petition No. 8096 of 2009 seeking release of the petitioner on bail under Sections 437 and 439 of Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
: PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8096 of 2009
Between:
A. Prabhakar @ Prabha, S/o late A. Narsimha
. Petitioner/A-1
( Accused in Cr. No. 621 of 2009 of Afzalgunj P.S., Hyderabad)
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Public Prosecutor,
High Court of A.P. Hyderabad, through P.S., Afzalgunj, Hyderabad
..Respondent /
Complainant
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS: Sri A. Ravi Shankar
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT : Public Prosecutor.
Petition under Sections 437& 439 of Cr. P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated
therewith, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 621 of 2009 of Afalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad pending investigation and trial.
The Court made the following :ORDER :
…contd…
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad
2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Chenchalguda, Hyderabad
3. The S.H.O., Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad
4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
5. One CC to Sri A. Ravishankar, Advocate (OPUC)
6. One spare copy.
Skm
HIGH COURT
BSSR,J
Drafted by: skm
Drafted on: 07-10-2009
DATE: 07-10-2009
BAIL ORDER
CRL. P. NO. 8096 OF 2009
DIRECTION
2 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Prabhakar @ Prabha
The State of Andhra Pradesh
B. Seshasayana Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
