Allowed

Vemula Veera Swamy, v. The State of A.P.

Telangana HC9 Jul 2009CRLP/4184/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh considered a bail petition filed by Vemula Veera Swamy under Sections 437 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court heard arguments from the petitioner and the public prosecutor and ordered the release of the petitioner on bail pending trial in Crime No. 2 of 2009.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail pending investigation, enquiry and trial.

Vemula Veera Swamy, Vs The State of A.P. — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE

¶4

: PRESENT :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 4184 of 2009.

¶7

Between:-

¶8

Vemula Veera Swamy S/.V. Kanaka Babu.

¶9

..Petitioner

¶10

(Accused No.1 in Crime No. 2 of 2009

¶11

on the file of the Chilakalapudi Police Station, Krishna District).

¶12

And

¶13

The State of A. P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,

¶14

High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.

¶15

..Respondent

¶16

Complainant in-do-

¶17

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner on bail pending investigation, enquiry and trial in Crime No.2 of 2009 of Chilakalapudi Police Station, Krishna District, in the interest of justice.

¶18

The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

¶19

The Court made the following ORDER :-

¶20

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶21

// TRUE COPY //

¶22

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶23

¶24

1.The I Additional Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. 2.The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.

¶25

3.The Station House Officer, Chilakalapudi Police Station, Krishna District. 4.The Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Avanigadda, Krishna District. 5.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyd(OUT).

¶26

6.One CC to Sri T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, Advocate(OPUC).

¶27

7.One Spare copy.

TKK

HIGH COURT

GVS.J

DT.09-07-2009.

BAIL ORDER.

CRL.P.NO. 4184 OF 2009.

¶34

RELEASE THE PETITIONER

ON BAIL.

DRAFTED BY TKK

DT.09-07-2009.

HIGH COURT

GVS.J

DT.09-07-2009.

BAIL ORDER

CRL.P.NO. 4184 OF 2009.

¶43

RELEASE THE PETITIONER

¶44

ON BAIL.

Vemula Veera Swamy, v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vemula Veera Swamy, v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunkari Venkatesh, Vs The State of A.P.

T.Sri Ram Kumar, Vs The State of A.P.

Madapalli Issak, Vs The State, Station House Officer, Akiveedu Police Station

Kandhikattu Sai chandra Suman Vs State of A.P. rep. by Public Prosecutor

Imtiyaz Quadri, Vs State of A.P.

Ankati Venkateswarlu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, through