turning, both A-1 and A-2 came from the bushes, that A-1 was holding iron rod and A-2 was having a knife in his hand and attacked them and caused injuries to both P.Ws.1 and 10, and thereafter, A-1 and A-2 snatched away M.O.1 containing the cash, and P.W.4, another employee in the cement factory, also witnessed the incident. According to P.W.4, he was returning from the factory to go to his house on his motor bike at about 1.30 or 1.40 p.m. and when he reached near the turning of Padmanabhanagar, he noticed some galata and immediately he stopped his vehicle and he saw two persons running away and that P.W.1 was crying that cash in a bag was taken away by thieves. He found P.W.10 lying on the ground with injuries. He did not identify the persons, who ran away from the scene of offence. It is his further evidence that, half an hour thereafter, some people were running towards the house of A-3, he also went to the house of A-3; some of his company officers and the police officials were also present; as the cash found in the house of A-3 along with A-1 and A-2, they were arrested. Though P.W.4 did not identify the assailants, the evidence of P.Ws. 1 and 10 would clearly go to show that the appellants 1 and 2 are the persons, who participated in the commission of offence. No doubt, the appellants 1 and 2 are totally strangers for P.Ws.1 and 10. But, at the same time, the incident is alleged to have taken place in a broad daylight and while snatching away M.O.1 bag containing cash, the assailants caused injuries to P.Ws.1 and 10. Therefore, their physical
