D.Bhavani v. P.Venkateswara Rao and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeals were dismissed because the parties settled the matter amicably out of court, leaving no cause for adjudication.
What did the court decide?
No order as to costs.
The appeals were dismissed because the parties settled the matter amicably out of court, leaving no cause for adjudication.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR
C.M.A.Nos.2507 & 2508 OF 2000
DATED:12-10-2009
C.M.A.No.2507 OF 2000
BETWEEN: Dasari Bhavani
…Appellant AND Kondru Venkataraju & Others …Respondents C.M.A.No.2508 OF 2000 BETWEEN: Dasari Bhavani …Appellant AND P.Venkateswara Rao & Others
…Respondents
This Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR
C.M.A.Nos.2507 & 2508 OF 2000
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy)
It is represented that the parties to the appeals have settled the matter amicably out of Court and in view of the said settlement, no cause survives for adjudication in the appeals.
In view of the above, both the appeals are dismissed. No order as to costs.
_______________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. __________________ B.CHANDRA KUMAR, J. OCTOBER 12, 2009 Tsr.
Dasari Bhavani
Kondru Venkataraju & Others
P.Venkateswara Rao & Others
A. GOPAL REDDY
B. CHANDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court