The writ petition, filed by a Gram Panchayat, was dismissed by a Single Judge as infructuous upon admission of the fact that the challenge had become impotent by relevant events. No costs were awarded.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION NO : 7791 of 2002
DATE: 04-02-2008
Between: Thokapally Gram Panchayat, Rep., by its Sarpanch, Peddaraveedu Mandal, Prakasam District.
..... PETITIONER
AND State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others.
.....RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION NO : 7791 of 2002
O R D E R:
Sri P.Srinivasa Reddy, advocate, representing Sri A.Giridhar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
____________________ C.Y.SOMAYAJULU,J
Date: 04-02-2008 KLP
Thokapally Gram Panchayat
State of Andhra Pradesh
C.Y. Somayajulu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
