Sutapalli Panduranga Rao v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition challenging a Form-II notice threatening eviction, the High Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's submission and pass appropriate speaking orders. The court held that the petitioner should not be dispossessed until such orders are passed.
What did the court decide?
The respondent was directed to consider the petitioner's explanation and pass appropriate speaking orders expeditiously; the petitioner was restrained from dispossession pending such orders.