18. It is also settled that even where the Tribunal has acted within its jurisdiction, writ of certiorari will lie, where the order of inferior Tribunal has been obtained by fraud, collusion or corruption, or where its decision is vitiated by an error of law apparent on the face of the record, as distinguished from error of fact. But, the third party to the proceedings invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indian, can as well show that the order of the Special Court has been obtained by fraud or collusion, or the Court has acted without its jurisdiction. Before invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a third party must show that he has got right, title and interest in the land in question, and the party obtained the order from the Special Court has no right, title and interest in the property. Therefore, we are of the opinion that, in certain circumstances, third party can invoke the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, against the orders passed by the Special Court under the Land Grabbing Act. Therefore, the first point is answered accordingly.
