Dismissed

B. Shobha Rani v. The Government of a.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC21 Jul 2008WP/14928/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus for the release of her son from illegal detention. Upon the court noting that the alleged detainee had already been produced before a Magistrate and released on bail subsequently to the filing of the petition, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous at the stage of admission.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.

B. Shobha Rani Vs The Government of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

¶7

WRIT PETITION No.14928 of 2008

¶8

Between: B. Shobha Rani, W/o. B. Vinay Sagar, R/o.H.No.1-5-14, Harijanawada, Sadasivapet, Medak District.

¶9

..... PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Superintendent of Police, Rangareddy District.

¶13

3 The Station House Officer, Vikarabad P.S.,

¶14

Vikarabad, Rangareddy District.

¶15

.....RESPONDENT(S)

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue of Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the Respondents to set at liberty of Sri B. Kiran Kumar, S/o. Vinay Sagar by declaring the detention of the petitioner by the 3rd respondents as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.SITA RAM CHAPARLA

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶19

The Court made the following :

¶20

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU

¶21

WRIT PETITION No.14928 of 2008

¶22

ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma)

¶23

This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents herein to produce her son viz., B.Kiran Kumar, s/o. Vinay Sagar, who was illegally detained by the third respondent police and set him at liberty.

¶24

2. When the matter came up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the alleged detenu had already been produced before the Magistrate concerned and was released on bail.

¶25

3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing remains for adjudication in the writ petition and the same has become superfluous.

¶26

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

_______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _______________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 21-07-2008 Msr.

..... REGISTRAR

// TRUE COPY //

SECTION OFFICER

1 The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Home, Government of A.P., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶33

2 The Superintendent of Police, Rangareddy District.

¶34

3 The Station House Officer, Vikarabad P.S.,

¶35

Vikarabad, Rangareddy District.

¶36

4. 2 CCs to the Advocate General, Government of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT).

¶37

5. 2 CD copies.

¶38

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU

¶39

WRIT PETITION No.14928 of 2008

¶40

21-07-2008

¶41

(Msr)

B. Shobha Rani v. The Government of a.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B. Shobha Rani v. The Government of a.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saleha, Hyderabad. Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Police

T. Rajendra Prasad, Vs The Station House Officer, Tanakallu Police Station

Narayana, Sy.No. 153, 154 Koheda Village, Vs The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar, Dilsukhnagar

Katta Krishna Saritha Vs Kothapali Venkata Rathnam

B.Laxmi Vs The Superintendent of Police,Karimnagar

Arjala Satyavathi Vs The Station House Officer, III Town Police Station