The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ appeal as infructuous upon counsel's submission that the subject matter no longer existed, without adjudicating any causes.
The writ appeal was dismissed as infructuous. There was no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY
WRIT APPEAL No: 508 of 1997
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 15.04.1997 in WP No: 6159 OF 1997 on the file of the High Court.)
BETWEEN:
Veligatla Rama Rao S/o Surya Rao, R/o Seetharaopet, Amalapuram, East Godavari District.
... APPELLANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant: MR.N.SUBBA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.V.SIVAIAH
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (Per Sri V. Eswaraiah, J)
Mr. G. V. Gangadhar, learned counsel representing Mr. N. Subba Rao, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the subject matter of the writ appeal has become infructuous and there survives no cause for adjudication.
Recording the above submission, the writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J
__________________ G. V. SEETHAPATHY, J
September 18, 2008 DSK
Veligatla Rama Rao
The Regional Manager A.P.S.R.T.C., Rajahmundry
The Depot Manager A.P.S.R.T.C., Amalapuram
V. ESWARAIAH
G. V. SEETHAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
