The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed appeal No. 446 of 2001 as infructuous after counsel for the appellants submitted that the underlying cause no longer survives for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT APPEAL NO : 446 of 2001
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 12/03/2001 in WP NO : 20704 OF 2000 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
1 Machi Reddy Rajarami Reddy S/o.Venkatasesha Reddy Paturivari Kandiga Muttukur Mandal Nellore Dist 2 Machi Reddy Venkata Sehsha Reddy S/o.Subbarami Reddy Paturivari Kandiga Muttukur Mandal Nellore Dist 3 Gandavarapu Sundaraiah S/o.Venkatasubbaiah Damaramadugu Butchireddypalem Mandal Nellore Dist 4 Singara Kondaiah S/o.Venkaiah Krishnapatnam vilalge Muttukur Mandal Nellore Dist 5 Raghala Subbalakshumma W/o.Venkataramana Krishnapatnam vilalge Muttukur Mandal Nellore Dist 6 Chinthala Molakaiah S/o.Gunnaiah Krishnapatnam vilalge Muttukur Mandal Nellore Dist 7 Deva Reddy Sujathamma W/o.Sadhananda Reddy Krishnapatnam vilalge Muttukur Mandal Nellore Dist
..... APPELLANTS
AND
1 Mandal Executive Magistrate and Mandal Revenue Officer Muthukur Mandal Nellore Dist 2 The District Collector Nellore District
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant:MR.C.V.MOHAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT APPEAL NO : 446 of 2001
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari)
When this matter is taken up, the learned Counsel for the appellants submits that the cause in this appeal does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ appeal has become infructuous.
Recording the above submission, this writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
________________________
Justice Ramesh Ranganathan
Date: 21st July, 2008 Nn/Gurc.
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT APPEAL NO : 446 of 2001
(Order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari)
21/07/2008
Machi Reddy Rajarami Reddy S/o.Venkatasesha Reddy
Machi Reddy Venkata Sehsha Reddy S/o.Subbarami Reddy
Gandavarapu Sundaraiah S/o.Venkatasubbaiah
Singara Kondaiah S/o.Venkaiah
Raghala Subbalakshumma W/o.Venkataramana
Chinthala Molakaiah S/o.Gunnaiah
T Meena Kumari
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
