The appellate court dismissed the writ appeal due to the absence of the contesting respondent (the workman). No substantive legal proposition to cite as the judgment is purely procedural.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 1312 OF 2011
Between:
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Jeedimetla Rangareddy District
.....Appellant
AND
Sri Uppala Mallesh and another
.....Respondents
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao)
This Writ Appeal was dismissed against the first respondent – workman on 08.09.2008. In the absence of the contesting respondent – workman, this writ appeal cannot be heard.
Hence, this writ appeal is dismissed. No order as to cost.
_______________________ Justice Ghulam Mohammed
__________________________ Justice Nooty Rama Mohana Rao
January 2, 2012 MAS
The Depot Manager, APSRTC
Uppala Mallesh
another
Ghulam Mohammed
Nooty Rama Mohana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
