J.Nokalamma v. The Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Cum Labour Court
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no party appeared despite listing for dismissal.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no party appeared despite listing for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
Writ Petition No. 9570 of 1997
Between J.Nokalamma ..Petitioner
AND
The Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, ..Respondents Vishakhapatnam and others
:: JUDGMENT ::
2.3.2007
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
Writ Petition No. 9570 of 1997
Inspite of posting the case under the caption ‘for dismissal’, no one appeared on behalf of the writ petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
costs.
NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO.J.
2.3.2007 psr
J. Nokalamma
The Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Vishakhapatnam
Nooty Ramamohana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court