In this writ petition, the Advocate for the petitioner submitted that there is no lis to be adjudicated and the matter has become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
W.P.No.8526 of 2004
Dated 1st day of October, 2007
Between: Girish Lalwani .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, General Administration, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others .. Respondents
O R D E R:
Sri L.Ravichander, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that there is no lis to be adjudicated in this writ petition and it has become infructuous.
In the light of his submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
_______________ 01.10.2007 bcj
Girish Lalwani
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, General Administration, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others
GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
