The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The petitioner represented that since he retired while the petition was pending, adjudication was no longer necessary.
None. Petition dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner's retirement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 34622 OF 1997
Date: 20.06.2007
Between:
G.K. Ranga Chary.
… Petitioner
and
1. A.P. State Electricity Board, rep., by its Secretary, Vidyut Southa, Hyderabad and three others.
… Respondents.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 34622 OF 1997
ORDER:
It is represented on behalf of Smt. K. Sesharajyam, learned Counsel for the petitioner that, since the petitioner retired during the pendency of this writ petition, the cause in the writ petition does not necessitate adjudication and that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
____________________________ Date: 20.06.2007 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
MRKR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the retirement of the petitioner during its pendency.
G.K. Ranga Chary
A.P. State Electricity Board
Ramesh Renganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
