The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear and no representation was made during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
WRIT PETITION No :26594 of 2001
Dated: 04.07.2007
Between: P.Durga Prasad
..... PETITIONER
AND
1.The Regional Transport Authority, Nellore,
represented by its Secretary and another ….RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
WRIT PETITION No.26594 of 2001
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is called for hearing none appeared for the petitioner nor any representation was made on his behalf either during forenoon session or in the afternoon session. Hence, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default. No costs.
____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 04-07-2007 Gsn.
P.Durga Prasad
The Regional Transport Authority, Nellore
GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
