In this oral order, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner submitted that the theatre in question had already been closed down.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
W.P.NO. 26451 OF 2001
DATED: 12.7.2007
Between:
Sri Satyanarayana Picture Palace, Visakhapatnam
… Petitioner
and
The Government of A.P., Home and Cinematography Department and others
… Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
W.P.NO. 26451 OF 2001
ORAL ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication since the theatre in question has already been closed down and thus the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
--------------------------------------------GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J
Date: 12.7.2007 cvm
Sri Satyanarayana Picture Palace, Visakhapatnam
The Government of A.P., Home and Cinematography Department
GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
