6. The Commissioner & Director of Agricultural Marketing, who was consulted in the matter has stated that licenses will be granted to those who are trading in notified Agricultural Produce, Livestock and products of livestock in the notified area under section 7(1) of A.P(AP&LS) Markets Act, 1966, that the Market Committee may be a resolution passed in a meeting or by circulation approved by majority consisting of not less than four of its members cancel or suspend the licenses granted to any Commission Agent or trader or any other person licensed under sub section (1) of section 7 of the Act, by satisfying the conditions laid down under Rule 52 of the A.P (AP&LS) Market Rules, 1969 and that is also a provision for appeal from the orders canceling and suspending the license under Rule 53 of the said Rules, on the orders of the Market Committee either on cancellation or suspension of license within a period of 90 days before the Director. He has further submitted that the contention raised by the CAMC, Suryapet that the Market Committee has got inherent power to revoke the suspension, is not correct since there is a separate provision under Rule 53, providing for appeal on the orders of cancellation or suspension of license and that there is a specific provision under Rule 53, the committee cannot take any action after suspension of license. He further stated on the contention raised by the CAMS, that if the explanation is accepted by the committee, the suspension period will not be continued or the suspension will be revoked that though, it is a fact that the Market Committee has taken a resolution for revocation of license, it is a circulation meeting conducted and not ratified in the subsequent meeting held and the CAMC, violated the Statutory Rules.
