The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner represented that the cause of action no longer survived.
the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
W.P.No.1477 of 1998
Between M.Swamy ..Petitioner AND The Selection Committee represented by its ..Respondent Regional Manager, Nalgonda Region
JUDGMENT
12.3.2007
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
W.P.No.1477 of 1998
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any longer and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
________________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHAN RAO.J.
12.3.2007 psr
M.Swamy
The Selection Committee represented by its Regional Manager, Nalgonda Region
Nooty Ramamohana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
