Allowed

P.Ravi Kumar Reddy v. Smt. P.Bhavani

Telangana HC2 Nov 2007TRCMP/151/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition under Section 151 CPC, the Andhra Pradesh High Court granted an interim stay for six weeks to stay all proceedings in O.P. No. 283 of 2003 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Eluru, pending the disposal of a transfer petition.

What did the court decide?

Interim stay for a period of six weeks issued on all further proceedings in O.P. No. 283 of 2003 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Eluru.

P.Ravi Kumar Reddy Vs Smt. P.Bhavani — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA RADESH AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE

¶3

: PRESENT :

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: R. SUBHASH REDDY

¶5

Tr.C.M.P.M.P.No.151 OF 2005

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.134 of 2005

¶7

Between:

¶8

1. Mohd Rahmat Bee

¶9

2. Mohammed Hameed aged 15 years

¶10

3. Mohammed Reshma aged 13 years

¶11

4. Mohammed Salman aged 12 years

¶12

(Petitioners 2 to 4 minors, and they are represented by

¶13

their mother and natural Guardian, the petitioner No.1herein) …Petitioner/

¶14

on the file of the High Court)

¶15

1. Pangidineeri Venkateshwarlu s/o. Ramulu, Lorry Driver, AAK.2491 R/o. H.No.11-24 , Subhash Road, Devara Konda Town , Nalgonda Dist.

¶16

2. Mohammed Allabkshu S/o. Masum Ali

¶17

Owner of Lorry bearing No.AAK-2491, R/o. K. Mallepally, Devara Konda, Nalgonda District.

¶18

3. The Oriental Insurance Company limited, rep: by its Divisional Manager, Vijayawada, Policy No.431102/105/00289/MV//3182/92 Valid from 3.3.1992 to 2.3.1993)

¶19

4. Phathima Bee, W/o. Jalaludin

¶20

5. Mohammed Jahangeer, S/o. Jalaluddin Both are R/o. B.No.17-302, Santhoshi matha Colony , Devara Konda Town Nalgonda District (Respondents Nos 4 & 5 are not necessary parties to this petition) … Respondents/

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. M. Madhava Reddy

¶22

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings inclusive of the trial, in O.P.No.283 of 2003 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum Principal District Judge, Eluru pending disposal of Tr.CMP.No.134 of 2005 presented to the High Court to withdraw the O.P.No.283 of 2300 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- Principal District Judge, Eluru, transfer and post the same to any Court having jurisdiction at Nalgonda.

¶23

The Court while directing issue of notice to the respondents herein to show cause why this application should not be complied with made the following Order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case.)

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

“There shall be interim stay as prayed for, for a period of six weeks.”

¶26

Post after four weeks.”

¶27

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶28

//TRUE COPY//

¶29

FOR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶30

..2..

¶31

¶32

1. The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum Principal District Judge, Eluru,W.G.District.

¶33

2. Pangidineeri Venkateshwarlu s/o. Ramulu, Lorry Driver AAK-2491, R/o. H.No.11-24 , Subhash Road, Devara Konda Town , Nalgonda Dist.

¶34

3. Mohammed Allabkshu S/o. Masum Ali

¶35

Owner of Lorry bearing No.AAK-2491, R/o. K. Mallepally, Devara Konda, Nalgonda District.

¶36

4. The Divisional Mangfer, Oriental Insurance Company limited, Vijayawada,Krishna District. ( 2 to 4 BY RPAD )

¶37

5. One spare copy.

High Court

RSRJ

Dated 30.3.2005

NOTE: POST AFTER 4 WEEKS

¶43

ORDER Tr.C.M.P.M.P.No.151 of 2005 IN Tr.C.M.P.No. 134 of 2005

¶44

Interim stay for a Period of six weeks.

¶45

RV Dated 2.4.2005

High Court

,RSRJ

Dated 30.3.2005

Note: Post after four weeks

¶50

ORDER Tr.C.M.P.M.P.No. 151 of 2005 In Tr.C.M.P.No. 134 of 2005 .

¶51

Interim stay for a period of Six weeks.

P.Ravi Kumar Reddy v. Smt. P.Bhavani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Ravi Kumar Reddy v. Smt. P.Bhavani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Trimax Agencies [Pj] Ltd, Vs Mavillapalli Venkata Subbamma

K. Swapna Vs K.Madhusudhan

M.a.Kareem Vs The Ap Central Power Distribution Company Limited

Poosapati Ananda Gajapathi Raju, Vs Thota Sneha Latha

Guduri Bhavani Vs Guduri Venkata Sunil Kumar

Amir Ali Vs Maneck H.Ghadiali