On merits of the particular case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition on the withdrawn basis. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND SIX
P R E S E N T
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.9937 of 2006
Between:
Mallampatti Guruvaiah, s/o. M.Ramaswamy,
Aged about 38 years, r/o. Narrawada,
Nellore district. … Petitioner
Versus
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Dhuthaluru,
Nellore district & Ors. … Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms.Chandana Madala
Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Revenue GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development.
O R D E R :
Ms.Chandana Madala, learned counsel for the petitioner states that on apprehension that certain names might not be in the voters’ list, the writ petition was filed but those names are very much available in the voters’ list and hence there is no necessity for further prosecuting the writ petition. Her statement is hereby recorded and accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
JUNE 19th, 2006. -------------------------
I s L. P.S. NARAYANA, J.
Mallampatti Guruvaiah
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Dhuthaluru
P.S. Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
