The writ petition was dismissed with costs on the ground that the cause of action had ceased to exist, rendering the petition infructuous.
No further adjudication; writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO: 8994 of 2004
Dated: 16-03-2006
Between: M/s. Sri Venkateswara Service Station Indian Oil Dealer, Rep., by its Managing Partner Sri G.Venugopal Rao. AND Indian Oil Corporation Limited Rep., by its Divisional Retail Sales Manager Himayatnagar, Hyderabad
..... PETITIONER
.....RESPONDENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO : 8944 of 2004
O R D E R:
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition
does not survive and therefore no further adjudication is necessary.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
G.ROHINI,J
Dated: 16-03-2006
Klp
M/s. Sri Venkateswara Service Station Indian Oil Dealer, Rep. by its Managing Partner Sri G.Venugopal Rao
Indian Oil Corporation Limited Rep. by its Divisional Retail Sales Manager Himayatnagar, Hyderabad
G. ROHINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
