The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No.6468 of 1998 as infructuous based on the petitioner's submission. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
Writ Petition No.6468 of 1998
Dated: December 12, 2006
Between:
Sridhar Duddilla, S/o. Sri Sripad Rao, 27 years, Advocate, R/o.A3/2, Erramanzil Colony, Hyderabad-482.
… Petitioner
And
Union of India, rep. By Secretary, Dept. of Telecommunications, New Delhi, and others.
… Respondents
Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter
of the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording his submission, the writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY.
December 12, 2006 MRR
Sridhar Duddilla
Union of India
R. Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
