Concorde Motors (India) Limited, formerly known as Vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) (Ltu)

The controversy is that pending an appeal, application for stay was dismissed by the competent authority. We have gone through the record. We feel that the interest of justice would have been met if stay was granted pending appeal, subject to deposit of half of the liability. Therefore, we set aside the order of the authority and direct that half of the disputed tax liability shall be paid by the petitioner by or before 31.3.2006. Till 31.3.2006, there shall be an unconditional stay and the stay shall continue till disposal of the appeal, provided the amount is deposited by or before 31.3.2006. The amount already paid should be given credit. The deposit of amount shall be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in the appeal.

¶19

Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶20

(BILAL NAZKI, J)

¶21

6^th March 2006

¶22

(G.CHANDRAIAH, J)

¶23

N.B: C.C. in two days. (B/o)

¶24

ajr

Concorde Motors (India) Limited, formerly known as v. The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) (Ltu)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Concorde Motors (India) Limited, formerly known as v. The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) (Ltu)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sk.Asia, Vs Mr.Shivarama Krishnan, C.I. of Police

M/s. Sainath Agencies, Vinukonda, Guntur District, Vs The Joint Commissioner of Commercial TAxes ( Legal)

M/s. Vijayalakshmi Agencies, Vs The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes(Legal)

M/s. Devika Agencies, Vs The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Legal)

M/s. Annapurna Roller Flour Mill Vs Assistant Commissioner (Ct) Ltu

Visakha Harbor and Port Workers Union Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax