Writ petition disposed of relying on a prior judgment from 1995 directing the petitioner to file Form 15-H with the first respondent.
Directed the petitioner to file Form 15-H before the first respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
WRIT PETITION NO.3951 OF 2006
Date:02-03-2006
Between:
N.Yasodamma …Petitioner
And
The Special Deputy Collector (LAO) And another …Respondents
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
WRIT PETITION NO.3951 OF 2006
O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J):
Heard learned counsel for the parties and with their consent, the writ petition is being disposed of at this stage as it is submitted by both sides that the controversy
raised in this writ petition is covered by a judgment of this Court in W.P.No.3934 of 1989, dated 13-12-1995.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-121995 passed in W.P.No.3934 of 1989 and the petitioner is directed to file Form 15-H before the first respondent. No order as to costs.
_____________________ (Bilal Nazki, J)
2nd March, 2006 _____________________ (G.Chandraiah, J)
vrn
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.3934 of 1989, dated 13-12-1995Followed¶16
N.Yasodamma
Special Deputy Collector (LAO)
another
BILAL NAZKI
CHANDRAIAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
