Dismissing a writ petition due to the absence of representation by parties, despite the matter being listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3148 of 1996
Dated: 16.06.2006
Between:
Kommara Yellayya, son of Sydulu …… Petitioner
AND
The Andhra University, represented by Its Registrar, Visakhapatnam and others …….Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3148 of 1996
ORDER: (per TCSR,J)
No representation on either side despite the fact that the matter stands listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even on earlier two occasions also, there had been no representation.
Writ petition is therefore dismissed. No order as to costs.
T.CH. SURYA RAO, J.
G. CHANDRAIAH, J.
Dated: 16..06..2006.
Rns
Kommara Yellayya
The Andhra University, represented by Its Registrar, Visakhapatnam
T.CH.Surya Rao
G. Chandraiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
