M.Bala Krishnaiah v. the Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed in default due to absence of petitioner's counsel at hearing.
Writ petition dismissed in default due to absence of petitioner's counsel at hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PEITION No. 29167 of 1995
Dated: 05.12.2006
Between: M. Bala Krishnaiah AND
… Petitioner
The Managing Director, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 29167 of 1995
ORDER:-
When the writ petition was called on 30.11.2006, counsel for the petitioner not present. Even today the matter which is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It is therefore reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
The writ petition is therefore dismissed in default. No order as to costs.
_____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
Date: 05.12.2006 ES
M. Bala Krishnaiah
The Managing Director, APSRTC
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court