The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition stating the matter was settled. Permission was accorded and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.28233 of 2005
Dated 17-03-2006
Between:
Rednam Ramarao. AND
.... PETITIONER
The Joint Collector, Kakinada, and three others.
.....RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.28233 of 2005
O R D E R:
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore no further adjudication is necessary on merits. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(G. ROHINI, J)
Date:17-03-2006
ghn
Rednam Ramarao
The Joint Collector, Kakinada and three others
G. ROHINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
