Partly allowed
B.R.Kumar v. The depot Manager, Apsrtc.
Telangana HCWP/25270/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This single-bench order revised a previous decision on the petitioner's service punishment. While the holding regarding future increments was set aside, the punishment of one-year deferment was retained but clarified to exclude any arrears of salary.
What did the court decide?
The order extending deferment of increments to future services was set aside, but the one-year deferment was retained; petitioner is not entitled to arrears of salary.