The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the Learned Counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous by this court with direction to the learned counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.20787 of 1996
Dated:05.12.2006
Between:
Samudrala Venkata Swamy and others. and The Union of India and others.
…Petitioners
…Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.20787 of 1996
ORDER:
Learned Counsel Ms.G.Gayatri, representing the learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri C.B.Ram Mohan Reddy, submits that the matter has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J)
05.12.2006 vs
Samudrala Venkata Swamy and others
The Union of India and others
V.V.S.RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
