This interim order granted an injunction restraining respondents 1 to 7 from interfering with petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule land depending disposal of the main CRP.
Interim injunction restraining respondents 1 to 7 from interfering with petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule land for four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
CRP. No. 2533 OF 2006
Between: Between: T. Krishnama Naidu.
Petitioner
AND
1. M. Sarangapani
2. M.Munemma
3. M. Bhaskar
4. M.Subrahmanyam
5. M.Venkateswarlu
6. M.Jagadeswar
7. M.Valliamma
(Respondent Nos.1,2,4 to 7 are rep. by their Power of Attorney agent, Madhu Bhaskar R/o M.g. Street, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District).
8.T.Eswaraiah Naidu S/o Mangapati Naidu
9.T.Radhakrishnaiah S/o Mangapati Naidu 10.T. Madhu S/o Mangapati Naidu 11.T.Padmavatamma W/o T. Eswaraiah Naidu. (all are agriculturists R/o Gurukulapalem V, Tottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District)
Respondents
To
1. M. Sarangapani
2. M.Munemma
3. M. Bhaskar
4. M.Subrahmanyam
5. M.Venkateswarlu
6. M.Jagadeswar
7. M.Valliamma (Respondent Nos.1,2,4 to 7 are rep. by their Power of Attorney agent, Madhu Bhaskar R/o M.g. Street, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District).
8.T.Eswaraiah Naidu S/o Mangapati Naidu
9.T.Radhakrishnaiah S/o Mangapati Naidu 10.T. Madhu S/o Mangapati Naidu
11.T.Padmavatamma W/o T. Eswaraiah Naidu. (all are agriculturists R/o Gurukulapalem V, Tottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District)
Whereas upon motion made unto this Court this day by Sri A. Chandraiah Naidu, Advocate for the Petitioner, this Court hath directed that an interim injunction shall issue restraining the respondents 1 to 7 from interfering with petitioner possession and enjoyment of petition schedule land, pending disposal of the CRP. No. 3450 of 2006 presented to the High Court to revise the order of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, made in E.A. No. 45 of 2006 in E.A. No. 140 of 2005 in E.A. No. 32 of 1996 in E. P. No. 19 of 1994 in O. S. No. 86 of 1975, dated 18-04-2006, for a period of four weeks from today.
You namely :
Madhu Bhaskar R/o M.g. Street, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District. (for self & for service on Respondents 1,2,4 to 7 as Power of Attorney Agent to 1.M. Sarangapani, 2.M.Munemma, 3.M.Subrahmanyam, 4.M.Venkateswarlu, 5.M.Jagadeswar & 6.M.Valliamma)
(Contd. 2.)
. 2 .
are hereby restrained either by yourself, or by yours servants agents or assignee from interfering with petitioner possession and enjoyment of petition schedule land, in O. S. No. 86 of 1975, dated 18-04-2006, for a period of four weeks from today.
Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this the Ninth day of June, 2006.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
BV
T. Krishnama Naidu
M. Sarangapani
M.Munemma
M. Bhaskar
M.Subrahmanyam
M.Venkateswarlu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
